Hotel Queens Park - London

Average rating:  1.7

Guest type: Single traveller

stayed in Mar 2008

They must hire their staff out of a Russian prison camp or something. There was one superb guy behind the desk, but everyone else was very surly. The room had so many broken and disgusting things about it, I would not recommend it to anyone.

Guest name: MF, Canada

Average rating:  9.2

Guest type: 

stayed in Feb 2008

We think the location of this hotel is perfect as it is so close to Queensway and two tubestations. When we arrived we found that our room were situated in the basement. We asked for another floor and luckely we got a great room on 5th floor, thank you!!! We paid only 260L for 5 nights, the last week of february. (Lovely weather) We wil be back for sure if the prices stays the same.

Guest name: GS, Norway

Average rating:  7.3

Guest type: Young couple

stayed in Feb 2008

Nice hotel, good quality for the price. The room was small but clean, the breakfast was quite good. The hotel is in a great position, perfect to visit London. I suggest this hotel if you want a cheap palce where just to sleep, not if you want spend time in there.

Guest name: Gerardo Cannella, Italy

Average rating:  8.9

Guest type: Family with young children

stayed in Feb 2008

this is a basic hotel, but for the cost you cannot fault the services and loaction. Ideal base for site seeing with two tube sations less than 5 minutes walk away

Guest name: GS, United Kingdom

Average rating:  5.3

Guest type: Young couple

stayed in Sep 2007

Stayed in a double room with my husband. Room small, building quite old, somewhat dirty and not refurbished. Everyday cleaning however is a con.

Guest name: Dimitra Verouli, Greece

Average rating:  0.6

Guest type: Mature couple

stayed in Oct 2007

I travel a lot every year and have never been met with so rotten treatment as at the Hotel Queens Park in London. And the standard was far away from my expectation. First night we was placed in a room beside the reception. Dirty, noisy, cold, uncomfortable beds and not working toilett and shower. And the staff had questions why we would like to change room. They also charge my credeit card without my knowing - we had been told that we should pay the bill when we checked out.

Guest name: Ann-louise Jobsson, Sweden

Average rating:  7.6

Guest type: Family with older children

stayed in Oct 2007

Nous avons eu une chambre triple spacieuse avec grande salle de bains.

Guest name: Martine MARY, France

Average rating:  4.2

Guest type: Young couple

stayed in Aug 2007

although the position of the hotel is quite central, the general impression was not good at all: the first room we were given was minuscule, and its cleanliness was not "trustworthy"; luckily we were given a slightly better room, the second day, after we had complained.

Guest name: SF, Italy

Average rating:  7.9

Guest type: Family with older children

stayed in Aug 2007

The relationship between price and quality is very good ! The room was very small but clean, an "eat as much as you can" continental breakfast is served, overall not a bad choice, I would come a second time.

Guest name: PF, Austria

Average rating:  6.5

Guest type: Single traveller

stayed in Aug 2007

Medium quality, very narrow bathroom but good position and good price

Guest name: Alessandro Paglairani, Italy

Average rating:  4.9

Guest type: Group

stayed in Aug 2007

A three star-hotel in London can, in my experience, not be compared with three star-hotels in other big cities. We stayed, through Venere, in a lovely 3 star-hotel in Bologna and a very nice 2 star-hotel in Hamburg, both less expensive than this less than satisfactory hotel in London. They first tried to give us a twin room that was definitely shabby. When we complained, we got a more adequate one. The service at breakfast was very poor, it was self-service, but half the time they were out of tea or milk and waiting times were long. The rooms on the floor where the single room was located was being redone, so there was noise, and it wasn't accessible by the (very tiny) lifts and I had to use a very dirty service staircase to get from the 4th to the 5th floor.

Guest name: EB, Switzerland

Average rating:  2.4

Guest type: Young couple

stayed in Jul 2007

Room was awfully small. Stains on wall and bed sheets and carpet was dirty. Toilet seat was a pretty bad shape. Other residents seem to be having a door-banging session at 7.30am in the morning. Only good thing about this place is the location. Near to Bayswater/Queensway tube station. However, for the same price, you can defintely stay somewhere nicer.

Guest name: HK, United Kingdom

Average rating:  7.6

Guest type: Mature couple

stayed in Jun 2007

Our room was in the basement next to the lift. Although noise from lift, squeaky floorboards above and din of underground trains below which cannot be helped as we are in the centre of London, we did sleep well, and the room was very spacious and clean. New furniture, plasma TV, new bathroom fittings. Added bonus of sufficent contiental breakfast, hotel only a few minutes from tube station. What more could you want for the price!! Recommend this hotel to anyone wishing to spend a few days in London.

Guest name: Valerie Sparrow, Italy

Average rating:  0.5

Guest type: Group

stayed in May 2007

The hotel is really old and it seems to be that the owners have never invested penny in it so you can find every kind of problems in this hotel. Definitely I will not suggest this hotel to anybody it is really awful.

Guest name: RR, United Kingdom

Average rating:  4.0

Guest type: 

stayed in Nov 2006

This was our first stay at Queens Park, the price was OK and also the location, but ... The concierge asked us to pay him for storing our luggage for a couple of hours after we had checked ut, that we never have met before. The cleaning women entered our room without knocking on the door first. In generall the staff was very nonchalant and not service minded. We had no electricity, no telephone for several hours , which ment, for example, cold water in the bathroom. We understood that it was not their fault, but they could at least have said that they were sorry.

Guest name: Birgitta Nilsson, Sweden

Average rating:  8.0

Guest type: Family with older children

stayed in Oct 2006

The breakfast was not impressing. All little more to choose, maybe cheese, meat. There was nothing else than jam ! The Venere - hotels we have visited in Berlin had far better breakfast, but the room on Queens Park was better. The beds were hard to sleep on, like sleeping on a stone.

Guest name: Tor Bille Langeland, Norway

Average rating:  6.6

Guest type: Single traveller

stayed in Aug 2006

Sunday to thursday. The purpose of my visit i London was pure plesure. Good food and theatre visits.

Guest name: ML, Sweden

Average rating:  5.6

Guest type: Not Specified

stayed in May 2006

on arrival did not have my RESERVATION and had to wait 45 minutes and then was told no reservation had been made but could fit us in as they only had one room, no chose of breakfast concidering my booking was confirmed by email why my wife and I had not had the RESERVATION made by Venere.com I don't know I wont be book with Venere.com again

Guest name: John Budge, United Kingdom

Average rating:  9.5

Guest type: Heterosexual Couple

stayed in Mar 2006

We loved our stay at the hotell. The staff was serviseminded and friendly! And the location was prefect! We will visit you next time we come to London!

Guest name: Tina Bjerke Skullerud, Norway

Average rating:  6.9

Guest type: Not Specified

stayed in Feb 2006

the main problem of this room was the noise both in the street and in the hotel... (people shouting, the reception phone ringing all night...) but the room was clean.

Guest name: Maud Lepin, France

Average rating:  8.2

Guest type: Group of friends

stayed in Feb 2006

Très bon acceuil, chambres propres et confortable un peu petite mais suffisante. Breakfast correct, et quartier très animé et agreable. Je recommande sans hesiter cet hotel, qui a un rapport qualité/prix excellent.

Guest name: KT, France

Average rating:  8.5

Guest type: Heterosexual Couple

stayed in Feb 2006

It was great value for the money we spent. Staff were generally very helpful. The first room we got had a really strong cigarette smell. When we told the reception, the lady politely let us check another room to change. The second room was smaller but alright, only missing the bathtub in the first room. Both bathrooms were bright and clean. My wife enjoyed the hot water in particular. Would have been better if Queensway tube station wasn't closed. Taking the bus would be more convenient.

Guest name: Ken Lai, United Kingdom

Average rating:  8.7

Guest type: Heterosexual Couple

stayed in Jan 2006

We enjoyed our stay here. We arrived at about 0200 after our plane was delayed and there was no problem checking-in at that late hour. The room was fine, although the matress was a little bit lumpy. Perhaps a few more containers of milk could have been provided for those of us that like milky hot drinks! The continental breakfast was a lot better than we were expecting as it seemed to be unlimited. Overall, a very pleasant stay.

Guest name: Kevin Meredith, United Kingdom

Average rating:  7.4

Guest type: Family Group

stayed in Jul 2004

Ebven if it was no AC the room was far to warm.

Guest name: Dan Stenström, Sweden

Average rating:  7.8

Guest type: Not Specified

stayed in May 2004

The hotel was from good to excellent, but they don't have the reservation by venere, I have to do it at the hotel just 4 days before

Guest name: Marco Xicotencatl, Mexico

Average rating:  2.9

Guest type: Heterosexual Couple

stayed in Jun 2003

was very disappointed,we were given a twin room instead of a double.the room was filthy and so small.the wallpaper was coming off the wall and there were damp marks in the very tiny bathroom.the beds were not clean.the pictures on the site were nothing like the room we were given.the room was dingy and it was similar to servants quarters!!!

Guest name: Martin Wade, United Kingdom

Average rating:  7.0

Guest type: Heterosexual Couple

stayed in Jul 2003

Queens Park Hotel is a very good alternative for leasure travellers (long weekend) in London. Rooms are London-typical small but the hotel is perfectly located at Hyde Park. Prices are much lower at venere!!!

Guest name: TG, Germany

Average rating:  2.8

Guest type: Heterosexual Couple

stayed in Jun 2003

The staff were ignorant upon arrival, the room was barely big enough for 2 of us and an alarm went off for no reason in the room at 07:30, the maid was knocking on the door at 08:15 to clean the room. Breakfast was uninspiring with little choice or quality. Overall a poor hotel with poor staff and facilities. We would not recommend this place to anybody we wanted to stay friends with.

Guest name: Vicki Bailey, United Kingdom